A descriptive study on Cybersex, Audio-Visual Sex Scandals, and Child Pornography

A descriptive study on Cybersex, Audio-Visual Sex Scandals, and Child Pornography: Prosecution under existing Philippine Laws, and Other proposals as a framework for future legislation
by Ailyn L. Cortez, Carlyn Marie Bernadette C. Ocampo-Guerrero, Michael Vernon M. Guerrero, and Reynaldo M. Pijo

--------

[ PREVIOUS: Understanding Pornography and an Overview of the Technology Available Today ]
[ PREVIOUS: The Philippine Experience ]

--------

III. Prosecuting the Offenses


I. Criminal Law

Act No. 3815, or the Revised Penal Code (RPC), was promulgated way back in 1930, decades b>efore the advent of computers and the Internet and before the proliferation of cheap image capturing devices, such video recorders and cameras. A number of special laws have provided means to protect both children and women from exploitation, such as Republic Act No. 7610, otherwise known as the “Special Protection And Discrimination Act,” as amended by Republic Act No. 7658 and Republic Act No. 9231, and Republic Act No. 9208 or the “Anti- Trafficking of Persons Act of 2003,” among others.


1. In General

The Revised Penal Code provision applicable in common to cybersex, sex scandal, MMS sex clips, and child pornography is Article 201, which provides:

Article 201. [ 154 ] Immoral doctrines, obscene publications and exhibitions and indecent shows. — The penalty of prision mayor [ 155 ] or a fine ranging from six thousand to twelve thousand pesos, or both such imprisonment and fine, shall be imposed upon:

  1. Those who shall publicly expound or proclaim doctrines openly contrary to public morals;
    1. The authors of obscene literature, published with their knowledge in any form; the editors publishing such literature; and the owners/operators of the establishment selling the same; (emphasis supplied, for production of pornographic materials, including child pornography, and distribution of which, especially in optical disks)
    2. Those who, in theaters, fairs, cinematographs or any other place, exhibit, indecent or immoral plays, scenes, acts or shows, whether live or in film, which are prescribed by virtue hereof, shall include those which
      1. glorify criminals or condone crimes;
      2. serve no other purpose but to satisfy the market for violence, lust or pornography; (emphasis supplied, for exhibition in the practice of cybersex and other forms of streaming pornography)
      3. offend any race or religion;
      4. tend to abet traffic in and use of prohibited drugs; and
      5. are contrary to law, public order, morals, and good customs, established policies, lawful orders, decrees and edicts;
  2. Those who shall sell, give away or exhibit films, prints, engravings, sculpture or literature which are offensive to morals. (emphasis supplied, for production and distribution of pornographic materials, especially in optical disks)

In case Article 201, by certain circumstances, does not apply; Article 200 of the Revised Penal Code provides:

Article 200. Grave scandal. – The penalties of arresto mayor and public censure shall be imposed upon any person who shall offend against decency or good customs by any highly scandalous conduct not expressly falling within any other article of this Code.

2. Cybersex and Child Pornography


A. Act No. 3815, the Revised Penal Code

Article 201, else Article 200, of the Revised Penal Code likewise applies as to the photographs and videos that may have been produced and distributed in the commission of child abuse. The minors depicted therein are properly victims in the crime, even if they may have been willing in participating in such, as they lack maturity and lack legal capacity to provide legal consent.

In contrast, chat hosts (cybersex models), who are above 18 years old and who conduct themselves in such practice in a lewd or lustful manner, although there may be no physical sexual intercourse at all, are within the purview of Article 202 (5) of the Revised Penal Code, which provides:

Article 202. Vagrants and prostitutes; penalty. – xxx

xxx

5. Prostitutes. — For the purposes of this article, women who, for money or profit, habitually indulge in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct, are deemed to be prostitutes.

Any person found guilty of any of the offenses covered by this articles shall be punished by arresto menor [ 156 ] or a fine not exceeding 200 pesos, and in case of recidivism, by arresto mayor in its medium period to prision correccional [ 157 ] in its minimum period or a fine ranging from 200 to 2,000 pesos, or both, in the discretion of the court.

Persons who are responsible in employing or inducing these persons into prostitution may be pursued through Article 341 of the Revised Penal Code:

Article 341. [ 158 ] White slave trade. — The penalty of prision mayor in its medium and maximum period shall be imposed upon any person who, in any manner, or under any pretext, shall engage in the business or shall profit by prostitution or shall enlist the services of any other for the purpose of prostitution.

Persons who are responsible in employing or inducing minors into prostitution may, in addition, be pursued through Article 340 of the Revised Penal Code.

Article 340. [ 159 ] Corruption of minors. — Any person who shall promote or facilitate the prostitution or corruption of persons underage to satisfy the lust of another, shall be punished by prision mayor, and if the culprit is a public officer or employee, including those in government-owned or controlled corporations, he shall also suffer the penalty of temporary absolute disqualification.

Other acts of lasciviousness, which may have been committed in line with child abuse, may also be penalized as provided by Article 339 of the Revised Penal Code, which states:

Article 339. Acts of lasciviousness with the consent of the offended party. — The penalty of arresto mayor shall be imposed to punish any other acts of lasciviousness committed by the same persons and the same circumstances as those provided in Articles 337 and 338.

B. Republic Act 9208

Section 3(a), of Republic Act No. 9208 (RA 9208, or the Anti- Trafficking of Persons Act of 2003) provides that

“Trafficking in persons” shall mean the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs. [ 160 ] (emphasis supplied)

Various acts and circumstances in RA 9208 are specifically penalized. First, Section 4 of said Act enumerates the acts constituting trafficking in persons, particularly involving prostitution, pornography and sexual exploitation, as

Section 4. Acts of Trafficking in Persons. - It shall be unlawful for any person, natural or juridical, to commit any of the following acts:

  1. To recruit, transport, transfer; harbor, provide, or receive a person by any means, including those done under the pretext of domestic or overseas employment or training or apprenticeship, for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
  2. To introduce or match for money, profit, or material, economic or other consideration, any person or, as provided for under Republic Act No. 6955, any Filipino woman to a foreign national, for marriage for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling or trading him/her to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
  3. To offer or contract marriage, real or simulated, for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling, or trading them to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor or slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
  4. To undertake or organize tours and travel plans consisting of tourism packages or activities for the purpose of utilizing and offering persons for prostitution, pornography or sexual exploitation;
  5. To maintain or hire a person to engage in prostitution or pornography;
  6. To adopt or facilitate the adoption of persons for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;

xxx

A violation of any act enumerated in Section 4 penalizes the person guilty of committing said act(s) to suffer “the penalty of imprisonment of twenty (20) years and a fine of not less than One million pesos (P1,000,000.00) but not more than Two million pesos (P2,000,000.00).” [ 161 ]

Second, Section 5 of the same Act enumerates the acts that promote trafficking in persons, to wit:

Section 5. Acts that Promote Trafficking in Persons. - The following acts which promote or facilitate trafficking in persons, shall be unlawful:

  1. To knowingly lease or sublease, use or allow to be used any house, building or establishment for the purpose of promoting trafficking in persons;
  2. To produce, print and issue or distribute unissued, tampered or fake counseling certificates, registration stickers and certificates of any government agency which issues these certificates and stickers as proof of compliance with government regulatory and pre-departure requirements for the purpose of promoting trafficking in persons;
  3. To advertise, publish, print, broadcast or distribute, or cause the advertisement, publication, printing, broadcasting or distribution by any means, including the use of information technology and the internet, of any brochure, flyer, or any propaganda material that promotes trafficking in persons;
  4. To assist in the conduct of misrepresentation or fraud for purposes of facilitating the acquisition of clearances and necessary exit documents from government agencies that are mandated to provide pre-departure registration and services for departing persons for the purpose of promoting trafficking in persons;
  5. To facilitate, assist or help in the exit and entry of persons from/to the country at international and local airports, territorial boundaries and seaports who are in possession of unissued, tampered or fraudulent travel documents for the purpose of promoting trafficking in persons;
  6. To confiscate, conceal, or destroy the passport, travel documents, or personal documents or belongings of trafficked persons in furtherance of trafficking or to prevent them from leaving the country or seeking redress from the government or appropriate agencies; and
  7. To knowingly benefit from, financial or otherwise, or make use of, the labor or services of a person held to a condition of involuntary servitude, forced labor, or slavery.

Any person found guilty of committing any of the acts enumerated in Section 5 of RA 9208 “shall suffer the penalty of imprisonment of fifteen (15) years and a fine of not less than Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) but not more than One million pesos (P1,000,000.00).” [ 162 ]

Third, Section 6 of the same Act enumerates the ways how trafficking in persons may be deemed qualified, to wit:

Section 6. Qualified Trafficking in Persons. - The following are considered as qualified trafficking:

  1. When the trafficked person is a child;
  2. When the adoption is effected through Republic Act No. 8043, otherwise known as the “Inter-Country Adoption Act of 1995” and said adoption is for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
  3. When the crime is committed by a syndicate, or in large scale. Trafficking is deemed committed by a syndicate if carried out by a group of three (3) or more persons conspiring or confederating with one another. It is deemed committed in large scale if committed against three (3) or more persons, individually or as a group;
  4. When the offender is an ascendant, parent, sibling, guardian or a person who exercises authority over the trafficked person or when the offense is committed by a public officer or employee;
  5. When the trafficked person is recruited to engage in prostitution with any member of the military or law enforcement agencies;
  6. When the offender is a member of the military or law enforcement agencies; and
  7. When by reason or on occasion of the act of trafficking in persons, the offended party dies, becomes insane, suffers mutilation or is afflicted with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

Any person found guilty of qualified trafficking under Section 6 suffers “the penalty of life imprisonment and a fine of not less than Two million pesos (P2,000,000.00) but not more than Five million pesos (P5,000,000.00).” [ 163 ]

Lastly, Section 7 of the same Act provides for the protection of the right of privacy of trafficked persons and the accused, to wit:

Section 7. Confidentiality. - At any stage of the investigation, prosecution and trial of an offense under this Act, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, judges, court personnel and medical practitioners, as well as parties to the case, shall recognize the right to privacy of the trafficked person and the accused. Towards this end, law enforcement officers, prosecutors and judges to whom the complaint has been referred may, whenever necessary to ensure a fair and impartial proceeding, and after considering all circumstances for the best interest of the parties, order a closed-door investigation, prosecution or trial. The name and personal circumstances of the trafficked person or of the accused, or any other information tending to establish their identities and such circumstances or information shall not be disclosed to the public.

In cases when prosecution or trial is conducted behind closed-doors, it shall be unlawful for any editor, publisher, and reporter or columnist in case of printed materials, announcer or producer in case of television and radio, producer and director of a film in case of the movie industry, or any person utilizing tri-media facilities or information technology to cause publicity of any case of trafficking in persons.

Any person who violates Section 7 of the law suffers “the penalty of imprisonment of six (6) years and a fine of not less than Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) but not more than One million pesos (P1,000,000.00).” [ 164 ]

Certain persons, natural or juridical, are meted additional penalties or limitations when they violate RA 9208, that is:


1. Corporation, partnership, and other juridical persons

If the offender is a corporation, partnership, association, club, establishment or any juridical person, the penalty shall be imposed upon the owner, president, partner, manager, and/or any responsible officer who participated in the commission of the crime or who shall have knowingly permitted or failed to prevent its commission. [ 165 ]

The registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and license to operate of the erring agency, corporation, association, religious group, tour or travel agent, club or establishment, or any place of entertainment shall be cancelled and revoked permanently. The owner, president, partner or manager thereof shall not be allowed to operate similar establishments in a different name. [ 166 ]

2. Foreigners

If the offender is a foreigner, he shall be immediately deported after serving his sentence and be barred permanently from entering the country. [ 167 ]

3. Government employees or officials

Any employee or official of government agencies who shall issue or approve the issuance of travel exit clearances, passports, registration certificates, counseling certificates, marriage license, and other similar documents to persons, whether juridical or natural, recruitment agencies, establishments or other individuals or groups, who fail to observe the prescribed procedures and the requirement as provided for by laws, rules and regulations, shall be held administratively liable, without prejudice to criminal liability under RA 9208. The concerned government official or employee shall, upon conviction, be dismissed from the service and be barred permanently to hold public office. His/her retirement and other benefits shall likewise be forfeited. [ 168 ]

4. Adopter

Conviction by final judgment of the adopter for any offense under RA 9208 shall result is the immediate rescission of the decree of adoption.

5. Person who engages services of trafficked persons

Any person who buys or engages the services of trafficked persons for prostitution shall be penalized, on his/her first offense for six (6) months of community service, as may be determined by the court, and a fine of Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00). On his/her second and subsequent offenses, such person may be penalized to imprisonment of one (1) year and a fine of One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00). [ 169 ]


C. Republic Act 7610

In addition, Article V, Section 9, of Republic Act No. 7610 establishes that “Obscene Publications and Indecent Shows” involves

“Any person who shall hire, employ, use, persuade or coerce a child to perform in obscene exhibitions and indecent shows, whether live or in video, pose, or model in obscene publications or pornographic materials or to sell or distribute the said materials shall suffer the penalty of prison mayor in its medium period.

If the child used as a performer, subject or seller/distributor is below twelve (12) years of age, the penalty shall be imposed in its maximum period.

Any ascendant, guardian, or person entrusted in any capacity with the care of a child who shall cause and/or allow such child to be employed or to participate in an obscene play, scene, act or movie shall be imposed a penalty of prison mayor in its medium period.” [ 170 ]


3. Sex Scandal optical discs and sexually-explicit MMS clips

Article 201, or Article 200 of the Revised Penal Code, are the provisions applicable to these forms of pornography. It is only by certain circumstances, such as that a pornographic material is included to an otherwise ambivalent statement, that Articles 355 and 359 of the Revised Penal Code may attach, as the issue as to “imputation” is emphasized. Article 355 provides:

Article 355. Libel means by writings or similar means. — A libel [ 171 ] committed by means of writing, printing, lithography, engraving, radio, phonograph, painting, theatrical exhibition, cinematographic exhibition, or any similar means, shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods or a fine ranging from 200 to 6,000 pesos, or both, in addition to the civil action which may be brought by the offended party.

Article 359, on the other hand, of the Revised Penal Code provides:

Article 359. Slander by deed. — The penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to prision correccional in its minimum period or a fine ranging from 200 to 1,000 pesos shall be imposed upon any person who shall perform any act not included and punished in this title, which shall cast dishonor, discredit or contempt upon another person. If said act is not of a serious nature, the penalty shall be arresto menor or a fine not exceeding 200 pesos.


II. Civil Damages

Civil damages, clearly, may be had for sex clip leakages that occur with sex scandal optical disc and MMS clips distribution.

The right to dignity, and the right to privacy of communication and correspondence, are rights protected by the Constitution. Section 11 of Article II of the 1987 Constitution (Declaration of Principles and State Policies”states that the

“The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights.”

Section 3(1) states that the

“privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law.”

In consonance to these, Article 26 of the Civil Code provides that

“every person shall respect the dignity, personality, privacy and peace of mind of his neighbors and other persons. The following and similar acts, though they may not constitute a criminal offense, shall produce a cause of action for damages, prevention and other relief: (1) Prying into the privacy of another’s residence; (2) Meddling with or disturbing the private life or family relations of another; (3) Intriguing to cause another to be alienated from his friends; (4) Vexing or humiliating another on account of his religious beliefs, lowly station in life, place of birth, physical defect, or other personal condition.”

Article 32 of the Civil Code, in turn, provides that

“Any public officer or employee, or any private individual, who directly or indirectly obstructs, defeats, violates or in any manner impedes or impairs any of the following rights and liberties of another person shall be liable to the latter for damages:

xxx

(11) The privacy of communication and correspondence;

xxx

In any of the cases referred to in this article, whether or not the defendant’s act or omission constitutes a criminal offense, the aggrieved party has a right to commence an entirely separate and distinct civil action for damages, and for other relief. Such civil action shall proceed independently of any criminal prosecution (if the latter be instituted), and may be proved by a preponderance of evidence.

The indemnity shall include moral damages. Exemplary damages may also be adjudicated.

The responsibility herein set forth is not demandable from a judge unless his act or omission constitutes a violation of the Penal Code or other penal statute.”

III. Evidence

The Rules on Electronic Evidence [ 172 ] was made effective on 1 August 2001 and initially applied to civil, quasi-judicial and administrative proceedings pending after the date of effectivity, and was a direct result of the enactment of Republic Act No. 8792 [ 173 ] , or the Electronic Commerce Act. The Supreme Court notes at the head of the Rules (Administrative Memorandum No. 01-7-01-SC) that

Acting on the Memorandum dated 18 June 2001 of the Committee on the Revision of the Rules of Court to Draft the Rules on E-Commerce Law [R.A. No. 8792] submitting the Rules on Electronic Evidence for this Court’s consideration and approval, the Court Resolved to APPROVE the same.

The Rules on Electronic Evidence shall apply to cases pending after their effectivity. These Rules shall take effect on the first day of August 2001 following their publication before the 20th of July in two newspapers of general circulation in the Philippines. (17th July 2001.) [ 174 ]

The Rules were amended on 24 September 2002 to include criminal cases in its coverage, effective 24 October 2002. [ 175 ] Section 2, Rule 1, of AM No. 01-7-01-SC, now reads as

Section 2. Cases covered. - These Rules shall apply to the criminal and civil actions and proceeding, as well as quasi-judicial and administrative cases. [ 176 ]

Electronic document is defined by Section 1 (h), Rule 2, of the Rules on Electronic Evidence as

(h) “Electronic document” refers to information or the representation of information, data, figures, symbols or other modes of written expression, described or however represented, by which a right is established or an obligation extinguished, or by which a fact may be proved and affirmed, which is received, recorded, transmitted, stored, processed, retrieved or produced electronically. It includes digitally signed documents and any print-out or output, readable by sight or other means, which accurately reflects the electronic data message or electronic document. For purposes of these Rules, the term “electronic document” may be used interchangeably with “electronic data message”.

In relation thereto, “Electronic data message” is defined by Section 1 (g), Rule 2, of the same Rules as

(g) “Electronic data message” refers to information generated, sent, received or stored by electronic, optical or similar means.

On the other hand, “Ephemeral electronic communication,” is defined by Section 1(k), of the same Rule, which provides

(k) “Ephemeral electronic communication” refers to telephone conversations, text messages, chatroom sessions, streaming audio, streaming video, and other electronic forms of communication the evidence of which is not recorded or retained. (emphasis supplied)

Electronic documents are functional equivalents of paper-based documents, as provided by Section 1, Rule 3 of the said Rules, to wit:

Section 1. Electronic documents as functional equivalent of paper-based documents. – Whenever a rule of evidence refers to the term of writing, document, record, instrument, memorandum or any other form of writing, such term shall be deemed to include an electronic document as defined in these Rules.

and the fact that a privilege communication is in the form of an electronic document does not lose the confidential character, as provided for by Section 3, of the same Rule:

Section 3. Privileged communication. – The confidential character of a privileged communication is not lost solely on the ground that it is in the form of an electronic document.

Electronic documents are admissible as evidence, according to Section 2, Rule 3 of the said Rules, which provides:

Section 2. Admissibility. – An electronic document is admissible in evidence if it complies with the rules on admissibility prescribed by the Rules of Court and related laws and is authenticated in the manner prescribed by these Rules.

Particularly, the manner audio, video and similar evidence is made admissible is provided by Section 1 of Rule 11, of the Rules on Electronic Evidence, to wit:

Section 1. Audio, video and similar evidence. – Audio, photographic and video evidence of events, acts or transactions shall be admissible provided it shall be shown, presented or displayed to the court and shall be identified, explained or authenticated by the person who made the recording or by some other person competent to testify on the accuracy thereof.

Section 2 of Rule 11, of the said Rules, on the other hand, provides for the admissibility of ephemeral electronic communications, to wit:

Section 2. Ephemeral electronic communications. – Ephemeral electronic communications shall be proven by the testimony of a person who was a party to the same or has personal knowledge thereof. In the absence or unavailability of such witnesses, other competent evidence may be admitted.

A recording of the telephone conversation or ephemeral electronic communication shall be covered by the immediately preceding section.

If the foregoing communications are recorded or embodied in an electronic document, then the provisions of Rule 5 shall apply.

Electronic videos, audios and images, whether in electronic or optical medium, although strictly not “Electronic documents” according the first sentence of Section 1(h), Rule 2, may be argued by technologically-inclined professionals to be within its context in light of the second sentence of said section in relation to Section 1 (g) of the same Rule, inasmuch as basic electronic formats of written documents, images, audio files, and video remain in binary [ 177 ] and ASCII [ 178 ] modes (the latter with proper file format identifiers at the start of its code), which are merely interpreted as user-viewable text, sound, images, and videos by appropriate computer programs or applications. This argument, however, may result to the same outcome as to the issue as to the definition of “hacking,” [ 179 ] which favors a legal conclusion without consideration to technical persuasion. It thus may be said that electronic video, images and audio, and similar forms are not “Electronic documents” although they constitute “Electronic evidence” nonetheless; in the same manner that photographs, videos, and phonographic records are not considered as part of such class of evidence which are documentary, but rather are included as object evidence.

The question remains whether the application of the Rules of Electronic Evidence is limited to cases based on its original context, that which relates to the Electronic Commerce Act and thus which involves purely business transactions, but which has been extended to include criminal cases; or whether the application of the Rules of Electronic Evidence is to be broadly applied to be deemed an extension of Rules 128 to 134 of the Revised Rules of Court, and thus the Rules apply to criminal cases even those without business complexion. A perusal of Section 1, Rule 1 of the Rules of Electronic Evidence – which provides

Section 1. Scope. – Unless otherwise provided herein, these Rules shall apply whenever an electronic document or electronic data message, as defined in Rule 2 hereof, is offered or used in evidence.

– and a perusal of the general definitions of electronic data message and electronic documents in Section 1 (g) and (h) of Rule 2, respectively – as quoted earlier – do not suggest data transmission to be exclusively confined to business transactions, and thus favor the second conclusion as to the applicability of the Rules.

IV. Miscellaneous: Convention and Treaty obligations

The Philippines is a signatory of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and thus is obligated to protect children from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Article 34 of said Convention requires that parties must protect children from being coerced to engage in any unlawful sexual activity, from being exploited in prostitution, and from being used in pornographic performances and materials. Article 34 of the Convention specifically provides:

“States Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For these purposes, States Parties shall in particular take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent:

  1. The inducement or coercion of a child to engage in any unlawful sexual activity;
  2. The exploitative use of children in prostitution or other unlawful sexual practices;
  3. The exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and materials.” [ 180 ]

In addition to this, the Philippines also ratified in 2002 the “Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography,” [ 181 ] which calls for governments to ensure that adults involved in the exploitation of children are punished, and that children who have been sexually exploited, abused, or trafficked receive services to allow for their full social reintegration and their physical and psychological recovery.


--------

[ NEXT: Proposals ]

--------

Endnotes

154. Article 201, Revised Penal Code, as amended by Presidential Decrees Nos. 960 and 969.

155. Arresto mayor has the duration of one month and one day to 6 months (Paragraph 5, Article 27, Revised Penal Code of the Philippines).

156. Arresto menor has the duration of one day to thirty days (Paragraph 6, Article 27, Revised Penal Code of the Philippines).

157. Prision correccional has the duration of six months and one day to six years (Paragraph 4, Article 27, Revised Penal Code of the Philippines)

158. Article 341, Revised Penal Code, as amended by Batas Pambansa Blg. 186.

159. Article 340, Revised Penal Code, as amended by Batas Pambansa Blg. 92.

160. Section 3(a), RA 9208. Supra, see note 3.

161. Section 10 (a) of Republic Act 9208. Ibid., see Note 3.

162. Section 10 (b) of Republic Act 9208. Ibid., see Note 3.

163. Section 10 (c) of Republic Act 9208. Supra., see Note 3.

164. Section 10 (d) of Republic Act 9208. Supra., see Note 3.

165. Section 10 (e) of Republic Act 9208. Supra., see Note 3.

166. Section 10 (f) of Republic Act 9208. Supra., see Note 3.

167. Section 10 (g) of Republic Act 9208. Supra., see Note 3.

168. Section 10 (h) of Republic Act 9208. Supra., see Note 3.

169. Section 11 of Republic Act 9208. Supra., see Note 3.

170. Republic Act 7610 is entitled :An Act for Stronger Deterrents and Special Protection against Child Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination, Providing Penalties for its violation and for Other Purposes.” See the Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence Databank - The Lawphil Project. http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1992/ra_7610_1992.html>

171. Libel is defined by Article 353 of the Revised Penal Code as “a public and malicious imputation of a crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead.”

172. See Rules on Electronic Evidence (A.M. No. 01-7-01-SC), See the Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence Databank - The Lawphil Project. http://www.lawphil.net/courts/supreme/am/am_01-7-01_2001.html.

173. Republic Act No. 8792 is entitled “An Act Providing and Use of Electronic Commercial and Non-Commercial Transactions, Penalties for Unlawful Use Thereof, and other purposes.” See the Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence Databank - The Lawphil Project. http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2000/ra_8792_2000.html

174. Rules of Electronic Evidence. Supra, see Note 172.

175. Soriano, Jaime N. “The Philippine Rules on Electronic Evidence: An Outline.” The Philippine Quarterly IT Law Journal, Volume 1, Number 1, p. 7.

176. Re: Expansion of the Coverage of the Rules on Electronic Evidence. Retrieved 20 February 2005 from Disini and Disini. http://www.disini.ph/res_sc_am_1-7-01.html

177. Binary. Supra, see Note 22.

178. ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange), generally pronounced ass-key, is “a character set and a character encoding based on the Roman alphabet as used in modern English and other Western European languages. It is most commonly used by computers and other communication equipment to represent text and by control devices that work with text. The printable characters in the correct order are !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=> ?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~ with a blank space in front.” (ASCII. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved 20 February 2005 from Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII)

179. Guerrero, Michael Vernon M., “’Hacking’ the Mercantile Law Bar Exam Questions.” The Philippine Quarterly IT Law Journal, Volume 1, Number 1, p. 1.

180. See the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/k2crc.htm.

181. See the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/6/crc/treaties/opsc.htm.